Merge pull request #183 from yrahal/main

Fix typos in Chap09 notebooks

Notebooks/Chap09/9_1_L2_Regularization.ipynb

@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
         "\n",
         "def draw_loss_function(compute_loss, data,  model, my_colormap, phi_iters = None):\n",
         "\n",
-        "  # Make grid of intercept/slope values to plot\n",
+        "  # Make grid of offset/frequency values to plot\n",
         "  offsets_mesh, freqs_mesh = np.meshgrid(np.arange(-10,10.0,0.1), np.arange(2.5,22.5,0.1))\n",
         "  loss_mesh = np.zeros_like(freqs_mesh)\n",
         "  # Compute loss for every set of parameters\n",
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@
         "for c_step in range (n_steps):\n",
         "  # Do gradient descent step\n",
         "  phi_all[:,c_step+1:c_step+2] = gradient_descent_step(phi_all[:,c_step:c_step+1],data, model)\n",
-        "  # Measure loss and draw model every 4th step\n",
+        "  # Measure loss and draw model every 8th step\n",
         "  if c_step % 8 == 0:\n",
         "    loss =  compute_loss(data[0,:], data[1,:], model, phi_all[:,c_step+1:c_step+2])\n",
         "    draw_model(data,model,phi_all[:,c_step+1], \"Iteration %d, loss = %f\"%(c_step+1,loss))\n",
@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@
         "# Code to draw the regularization function\n",
         "def draw_reg_function():\n",
         "\n",
-        "  # Make grid of intercept/slope values to plot\n",
+        "  # Make grid of offset/frequency values to plot\n",
         "  offsets_mesh, freqs_mesh = np.meshgrid(np.arange(-10,10.0,0.1), np.arange(2.5,22.5,0.1))\n",
         "  loss_mesh = np.zeros_like(freqs_mesh)\n",
         "  # Compute loss for every set of parameters\n",
@@ -399,7 +399,7 @@
         "# Code to draw loss function with regularization\n",
         "def draw_loss_function_reg(data,  model, lambda_, my_colormap, phi_iters = None):\n",
         "\n",
-        "  # Make grid of intercept/slope values to plot\n",
+        "  # Make grid of offset/frequency values to plot\n",
         "  offsets_mesh, freqs_mesh = np.meshgrid(np.arange(-10,10.0,0.1), np.arange(2.5,22.5,0.1))\n",
         "  loss_mesh = np.zeros_like(freqs_mesh)\n",
         "  # Compute loss for every set of parameters\n",
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@
         "for c_step in range (n_steps):\n",
         "  # Do gradient descent step\n",
         "  phi_all[:,c_step+1:c_step+2] = gradient_descent_step2(phi_all[:,c_step:c_step+1],lambda_, data, model)\n",
-        "  # Measure loss and draw model every 4th step\n",
+        "  # Measure loss and draw model every 8th step\n",
         "  if c_step % 8 == 0:\n",
         "    loss =  compute_loss2(data[0,:], data[1,:], model, phi_all[:,c_step+1:c_step+2], lambda_)\n",
         "    draw_model(data,model,phi_all[:,c_step+1], \"Iteration %d, loss = %f\"%(c_step+1,loss))\n",
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@
     {
       "cell_type": "markdown",
       "source": [
-        "You should see that the gradient descent algorithm now finds the correct minimum.  By applying a tiny bit of domain knowledge (the parameter phi0 tends to be near zero and the parameters phi1 tends to be near 12.5), we get a better solution.  However, the cost is that this solution is slightly biased towards this prior knowledge."
+        "You should see that the gradient descent algorithm now finds the correct minimum.  By applying a tiny bit of domain knowledge (the parameter phi0 tends to be near zero and the parameter phi1 tends to be near 12.5), we get a better solution.  However, the cost is that this solution is slightly biased towards this prior knowledge."
       ],
       "metadata": {
         "id": "wrszSLrqZG4k"